If you are interested in our work, please send please e-mail to
bewegung-eurasien@gmx.de --------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -
Eurasia overall
Alexander Dugin and the movement Eurasia
Contents:
first Eurasia about everything Alexander Dugin
second ESTABLISHMENT of the International Eurasian Movement "means third
understanding defeat of Alexander Dugin
Photo: Alexander Dugin, chairman of the Eurasia movement 4th Alexander Dugin in conversation
The fifth program of the" Eurasian Movement "
6th The star of the Invisible Empire, via the traditional writer Parvulesko, 7 Alexander Dugin
Book Review: What holds together Russia, by Michael Thumann
48 pages, b. / w. Illustrations. Price: EUR 5.50
This publication can be purchased at the Regin-Verlag.
Please note that the boy even in the best forum refer to the subscription price of € 20.00 for four issues can.
Copyright (c) 2004 Regin-Verlag. All rights reserved. Regin-Verlag /
info@regin-verlag.de ----------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -----------
EURASIA ABOUT EVERYTHING
The manifesto of the movement Eurasia The idea of crisis in modern Russia
in Russian society - particularly in the politico-social sphere - is at the beginning of the new millennium a pathological deficit of ideas felt. The majority of people - including rulers, politicians, scientists and workers - can be in their political decisions by a combination of momentary factors guiding interests and ephemeral ephemeral random calls. The consequences are loss of feeling a sense of life, the idea of a logic behind the story, and the duties of the people sway the fate of the world. The social behavior of individuals is determined by aggressive advertising. In place of a meaningful and responsible political philosophy is more or less by "public relations" entered certain information world. The output idea of struggle is determined by the size of the investment and the quality of political propaganda
. Dramatic clashes of peoples, cultures and religions have been transformed into "shows." These are directed by multinational companies and partnerships in order to divert attention from the economic interests of these giants. Human blood, human life, human spirit for statistical abstract, the practical value, at best, demagogic phrase in the sweet moans and ambiguous, in which the double standard is hidden. In place of the totalitarian Nichtinfizierung the totalitarian indifference is entered. The majority of political parties have formed social movements and to pursue only economic goals. Virtually nowhere can you find a clear and consistent belief that people can escape from the dormant state of indifference, only such a belief can make sense of life.
Americanism and the need for the alternative
The most dangerous project and their ideas of the consistent liberals dar. These forces, which are based in geopolitical terms, the U.S. and the West, have U.S. policy as a model . The American economic system is carried out by these forces as well as the type of American Society and the "American culture" referred to Americanism. This camp has the advantage: His project is logical and unwidersprüchlich, here are the theory and practice closely. Liberals say yes to unity determined world that is confused, meaningless, individualistic, oligarchic, to a world that has lost all moral, spiritual and traditional orientation. This kind of world the U.S. is trying to create a global framework. The U.S. as a superpower feel because of their technological and economic superiority entitled, "Grand Chessboard" (Zbigniew Brzezinski) become. Evident, however, that the Americanization of Russia and the rest of the world only by the slavish devotion of many governments in the face of the U.S. self-image as "world police" is possible. A negative attitude to the American way of life and the infamous "New World Order" shall be approved. We should welcome this rejection everywhere where they are found. But that alone is not enough. Rather, we need an active counter-project, a realistic, practical and comprehensive alternative. The conditions at the beginning of the new millennium are radically different from previous enlargements. People who want a new future, instead of that U.S. chaos that can guide America and wants to impose on us, therefore, may not only say no, but must also a clear plan to formulate their own civilization, it according to make, confirm and defend eventually. The only large-scale, summary and alternative world view that an American hegemony, and thus the unipolar world, can offer the end, the Eurasian doctrine.
The fathers of the Eurasian doctrine
is
Historically, the Eurasian doctrine in the 20's emerged as a test of the logic of political and social, cultural and geopolitical development of Russia. The Eurasian philosophers saw this development for the unit as a continuous process, which stretched from Old Russia to the USSR. Eurasists saw in the dialectic of the national destiny of the Russian people and state is a historical unit shipment, which occurred differently in different times. The main thesis of the early Eurasian philosopher states: "The West is against humanity," that is against the peoples of the world, the great diversity of cultures and civilizations. Against the unitary, totalitarian Western model is to be against the economic, political and cultural dominance of the West to act.
Russia - the old Orthodox monarchist and Soviet Russia - were to Eurasian philosophy, the bulwark and the vanguard of this global process, the citadel of freedom against the hegemony of the godless, secular, pragmatic and selfish outgrowth of Western civilization, with its claim to physical and mental domination. For this reason, welcomed the eurasists the USSR as a new paradoxical form of the original Russian way. They welcomed
not atheism or materialism in the sphere of culture, but saw behind the facade of the archaic communist national traits, and found in Soviet Russia the geopolitical legal heir of the Russian mission. The Eurasian philosophers were consistent and convincing Russian patriots. They came to the conclusion that the old traditional
Forms in the Russian national idea had developed in recent centuries, a false impression aroused: the solutions of the Romanovs "orthodox religion" and "absolute monarchy" were only a conservative facade, behind which is a completely modern, copied from Europe Content was. The Soviet Patriotismusäußerte the national idea in terms of class ideology, the core of the problem were not quite civilization and the meaning of the historical mission of Russia is not precisely defined. The secular nationalism of the Romanovs was formalistic and imitated European forms of government. The Soviet patriotism ignored the national elementary force, tore the connection to the tradition, rejected the patriarchal faith. It was necessary, a synthesis, to develop a new approach. Such a view was created with the Eurasian political and social philosophy in the "Eurasian Movement". The fathers of the "Eurasian Movement" saw for the first time the positive in the multinational nature (natural realm) of the Russian state.
they were particularly attentive to the Turkfaktor. They saw the role of Genghis Khan heritage, the season of the Tatar rule by Moscow in the 16th Century was perceived as a decisive turning Russia to the east. In the Greek Orthodox tradition is precisely this Time, the "Holy Russia," Moscow is here transformed into the Third Rome (after the fall of Constantinople first, and then the Byzantine Empire). The mission of the Holy Russia spoke in defense of the Eurasian culture, the original community, which was by and large different from the way Catholic or Protestant countries in the West. The
eurasists presented Russia as the vanguard of the East against the West as a defensive front of the traditional communities to the modern, secular, rationalist society. But suitable in its centuries-long struggle to preserve their cultural identity in Russia - in contrast to other Eastern countries - active in Western knowledge. Russia received technical achievements, borrowed certain methodologies, but each time only with the aim to counter the West's arms to hit the enemy with his own weapons. In modern parlance this means that Russia went the way of a "modernization without Westernization." That is why Russia was so long, longer than other traditional communities to effectively withstand the pressure of the West.
the conclusion that the "movement Eurasia it takes is this: Russia is not merely require a return to his roots, but a Combination of conservative and revolutionary bases, Russia must modernize actively develop, open up some of the surrounding world, while retaining its own identity at the same time strict and firm. For this reason, one has the Eurasian philosophers "orthodox Bolsheviks called. This remarkable movement has been historically not adequately assessed. The impressive success of the Marxist ideology made sophisticated, conservative and revolutionary ideologies of the Eurasian philosophers are not in the operational sense superfluous. End of the 30s was the original impetus of the "Eurasian Movement" in Russia and around Russia Emigration of politicians and ideologues to teachers about (represented primarily by the Russian historian Lev Gumilow).
The Neo-eurasism approach
The dramatic events and developments of recent decades, both within and outside the borders of Russia, the ideas of philosophers Eurasian again made timely and important. The enemy of the West, the USSR went under, and the Marxist ideology lost its attraction for people. The result was an ideological vacuum. It was not a new common alternative to the Western mind and liberalism exists. It could also arise no real alternative. Isolated and separated Fragments - a pre-revolutionary nationalism, clericalism, a mechanical Sovietism or extravagant fantasies of environmentalism and left-wing extremism - could not form a united front. There was no common ideological basis, not lowest common denominator. Situational approaches of the different viewpoints brought opponents of globalism and Americanism are any genuine ideological synthesis. At that moment turned very attentive minds, good hearts and good souls to the Eurasian heritage. They found the mineral spring, the seeds of doctrine, the belief that fully met the needs of the historic moment. Neo-eurasism began to make: as a social, philosophical, scientific, geopolitical and cultural movement in the late 80s. The lesson came from the heritage of the Russian-Eurasian philosophers of the 20's and 30's. They took the spiritual experiences of the orthodox tradition of the Russian Orthodox religion, and drew on the social criticism of the Russian socialists.
The achievements of Soviet stage of our history were evaluated. Ideologically, the prevailing philosophy of conservatism and the Conservative Revolution, also geopolitical methodology and original studies of the revolutionary "New Left" (ie, the
intellectual currents that have been developed in the West, but oriented towards the Western logic of development). All this combined, provided a serious ideological platform. In modern Russian society was constituted in a scientific direction, to a system of social and cultural initiatives. The consequence was that the Neo-eurasism the foundations of modern Russian geopolitics has created. Because of the huge cadre structure followers of this movement was soon catapulted to positions of power and in key ministries. Finally, it was the teaching of the Eurasian geopolitics, establishing many serious, operational international military and economic projects. Neo-eurasism acted on the ailing Russian modern political science, sociology and philosophy. Neo-eurasism gradually became the main conceptual tool of Russian state-building strategy.
This strategy must not of momentary political processes, but must depend on historical, geographical and historical constants. Neo-eurasism was a basis of the avant-garde trends in youth culture, it was an invigorating boost to the creative forces, it was the development of art, a clear direction. Neo-eurasism influenced many political parties and movements of modern Russia - we find large borrowings from the ideological arsenal of the Neo-eurasism program in theses Movements, such as the "unity" and the Communists (KPRF), the party Fatherland-All Russia (OVR), the Liberal Democrats (LDPR), the "movement Russia" and in many smaller movements and parties. These borrowings, however, remain fragmented, as they combine with other contradictory and thus retarding elements.
The new social-political subject
Now we must take a decisive step and give the Eurasian doctrine of a concrete, social-political dimension. The new leadership of Russia will take care of serious commitment to solving the strategic problems of the country. She is not satisfied with primitive and destructive prescriptions that will win by the West and the Russian representative, in influence in Russia. The new leadership needs to be philosophical and socio-political support. The present rulers are radically different from those of the late Soviet period and also by those of that era that uncritically enthusiastic for the mundane liberalism. A new state ideology, a new Russian model of the Russian policy are acutely needed. This is also the fact that today's power is in urgent need for a national idea. If
useful for the solution of the current exercise, the present political party system is (we say but that it is useless), so it has when viewed from a wider perspective no chances and needs radical reform.
This system was created in the process of destruction of the Soviet model and the emergence of liberal-democratic state along Western lines. Today this system of Russia is absolutely useless. Necessary parties and movements that act on the basis of a
belief that bring the interests of the entire spectrum of the population expressed: a world view that is connected with the people who educate the people and defended, and not an ideology the trust (and naivety) of the masses for their private interest or that of a lobby abused. All conditions for the emergence of a clear, goal-oriented Eurasian movement matured in the new Russia.
Those people who stood at the beginning of the Neo-eurasism who created the theoretical background and foundations of the Russian geopolitics of the Eurasian philosophy, those people who shaped the conservative-revolutionary political science and sociology, which for many years led the fight for Eurasia ideals have who have sacrificed themselves for the rebirth of the Russian people and our great country, these people have decided to form a new social-political "movement Eurasia.
Who will be the participants in the movement of Eurasia "?
Who will be invited to join us and support our movement? We speak to every Russian, educated or uneducated, influential, rich or dirt poor, workers and managers, non-performing or successful, Russian or Tatar, Greek Orthodox and Jew, conservative or modernist, student, or policeman, a member of the landing troops, or weaver, Governor or rock musicians. Our message, however, is only for those who love Russia and imagine a life without Russia can not. People who understand the need for a serious effort, an effort we all need to see our country and people on the map of the new millennium (which do not our enemies). We must passionately desire that we finally set up with all our strength to make the back straight and free our body from parasitic growths.
We have the scales fall from eyes that we represent in our country on the continent in the world, our solar Russian ideals - ideals of freedom, justice and fidelity to the roots.
The radical center
The Movement Eurasia "is based on the principles of a radical center.
We are not left and not right, we are not obedient slavish swamp, and no screaming opposition at all costs. We believe that today's power in Russia - needs the help, support, solidarity and unity - in persona, Russian President Vladimir V. Putin. In this day and age a blind submission, an uncritical leniency with the regime is no less (if not more) pernicious than open rebellion. We are centrists in the extent to which the President and the power for the good of the people and country and not populist moment, but is in perspective. And we are hard on the side of the President and be radical to the end. We are not looking for the little mistakes are, affirm all the pressures and difficulties, if Russia itself the goal is that our country and the whole world from the terrible danger posed by the West, must be saved. Thus our predecessors, the Eurasian philosophers, the Orthodox fundamentalists, who supported the Marxist regime, because the West - the greater evil - resistance. Our centrism is not passive.
We are fully aware that today's power is in Russia to an objective logic, but no clear idea of strategic objectives and the basic philosophical and mental problems of the new millennium - this is very dangerous, risky, threatening, doubtful, which has drawn any lesson from the centuries of bloody battles and cruel suffering - has. In this sense, the current power confused and in need of help, the landmarks and milestones, the most active, most energetic, most intelligent, idealistic, patriotic part of our people (this part has to come in our movement, are the core of the movement) must give their . We believe that the kingdom lance in hand, and therefore, the rulers of the voice Eurasia listen. This voice is not a servile "arbitrary as" the good, docile, artificial wing chair parties. It is the powerful radical reputation of the soil, the voice of the generations, the roar from the depths of our spirit and our blood.
represents the priorities of the Movement Eurasia
Our movement, the Eurasian principles to all levels of life. In the sphere of religion means a constructive solidarity Tetralog of traditional religions of Russia: the Greek Orthodox Church, Islam, Judaism and Buddhism.
The Eurasian branches of world religions have many discrepancies that the expression of these religions in other parts of the world. There is a common style of the Eurasian clergy, but not of the cultural differences or the authenticity of the teachings diminish. This is a serious and positive basis for the approach of mutual respect, for mutual understanding. Thanks to the Eurasian approach to religious issues will be able to handle disagreements and overcome many interdenominational. In the sphere of foreign policy planning to "move Eurasia" a comprehensive process of strategic integration. The recovery on the basis of a federal independent states of the Eurasian Federation "- the analogue of the structure of the Soviet Union on a new idea base on new economic and new administrative Basis. The strategic integration of intra-Soviet space has gradually spread to larger areas: the countries of the Moscow axis - Tehran - Delhi - Peking. The Eurasian policy must open for Russia access to warm seas, not in the way of war and suffering, but in the way of peace and good neighborly cooperation. The Eurasian politics in the West is planning special relationship with the countries of Europe. Modern Europe is - in contrast to the days when the fathers of Neo-eurasism the basics worked out - not the "source of world evil." The turbulent political events
20th Century have contributed to this source has shifted further to the West: Now called USA. Russia in Europe these days can find those strategic partners who are interested in the restoration of their earlier political violence. The Eurasian Russia must occur in the role of the liberator of Europe, as a liberator from the political, economic and cultural U.S. occupation. The Eurasian policy of Russia is interested in active cooperation with countries of the Pacific region. The economic giants of this geographical area have to see in the Eurasian policy of Russia the landmark for a separate political development and in the Potential in Eurasia is by its resources, the opportunity for new markets. At the global level will the "Eurasia movement" the same as the anti-globalization movement. This is reflected in the active and general confrontation course which controls the "Eurasian Movement" in relation to globalization. The "movement Eurasia namely consistently defended the great diversity of peoples, religions and national cultures.
all anti-globalist tendencies are necessarily "Eurasian". We are the consistent supporters of the "Eurasian federalism". This means the combination of strategic unity and the ethno-cultural autonomy, in some cases also with the economic, the hierarchically graded structure connected at the local level with the strict centralism in those key moments, which are connected with the interests of the state. We must revive the traditions of the Russian people, contribute to the recovery of population growth the Russians, and awaken the senses for the people of peculiar organic spirituality and ethics, high ideals, the living and the passionate patriotism again. Without the rebirth of the Russian nation the Eurasian project has no chance of being realized. This finding is based on our entire world view. The "movement Eurasia" means in the social sphere, the dominance of the principle of the social over the personal, the subjugation of the economic models under the strategy, and social tasks. The whole history of economic Eurasia shows that the development of economic mechanisms in this case a logic is subject, which is an alternative to the liberal-capitalist and individualist models of personal enrichment that has developed in the West on the basis of the Protestant ethic.
A liberal logic of the economy is far from Eurasia, which is an ancient train our people, which may not destroy. The collective community principle of economy, bring in the Criterion of "justice" in the process of distribution: This is a fixed train of our economic history. The "movement Eurasia" insists on the positive assessment of this factor, and on this basis, it gives preference to the socially-oriented economic models. The "movement Eurasia evaluated the effect of the archaic world of ancient tradition as a positive. In the development of the cultural process provides for the "movement Eurasia" a new appeal to the archaic, the original cultural motifs into the fabric of modern forms are to be woven. The emphasis here is on national subjects as the sources of folk art and a guarantor of the continuation and the revival of traditions. The Eurasian is a new life and fresh outlook, which is aimed primarily at young people, to people whose consciousness is not the chaotic jumps from a live remote theoretical model to another, even less appropriate model is spoiled. The Eurasian ideal is the powerful, passionate, healthy and beautiful human being, and not the cocaine addicts, the bastard of secular nightclubs, the anti-social criminals or prostitutes.
We can offer other, positive values, instead of the worship of the deformed and diseased tissue, instead of cynicism and groveling before the meager compensation for the real life. We do not allow that our children are killed, raped, humiliated, perverted, sold and made drug addicts. Our ideal is the celebration of physical and mental health, strength and heroism, loyalty and honor. The objectives of the "Eurasia movement" can only be achieved if many people rally around her. Also, the individual can do something, but the poetry is, as Lotréamont said the cause of all! This is particularly true of Eurasia: It is the thing of all! Now everything depends on our efforts. No one wins or it will only increase the convenience of the living standard or mature stage spectacle. It always starts with the daily painstaking work, to be perceived from the outside no. Before us lie difficulties and struggles, losses and suffering, but also great joy and a great goal!
